PDA

View Full Version : Tiger woods to payout $750m to ex-wife


RACER X
07-02-2010, 12:33 AM
http://www.whec.com/sports/stories/S1632732.shtml?cat=571

"It's a huge divorce settlement between Elin Nordegren and Tiger Woods. Nordegren will get $750 million dollars but she has to stay silent.

The London Sun says the divorce has been finalized and Woods and Nordegren will sign the papers next week in court in Orlando, Florida.

Nordegren reportedly cannot say anything publicly about Tiger's extra marital affairs and Woods is not allowed to bring any women around his two children"

Riceaholic
07-02-2010, 02:41 AM
http://www.whec.com/sports/stories/S1632732.shtml?cat=571

"It's a huge divorce settlement between Elin Nordegren and Tiger Woods. Nordegren will get $750 million dollars but she has to stay silent.

The London Sun says the divorce has been finalized and Woods and Nordegren will sign the papers next week in court in Orlando, Florida.

Nordegren reportedly cannot say anything publicly about Tiger's extra marital affairs and Woods is not allowed to bring any women around his two children"

Would have been $741,000,000 less expensive to put her in someones trunk.

karl_1052
07-02-2010, 07:10 AM
I thought he had only made $800million or so up until this point.

According to Golf Digest, Woods made $769,440,709 from 1996 to 2007

That is more than half. He should send her swimming in the gulf instead.

Particle Man
07-02-2010, 07:59 AM
hey, he shouldn't have let someone else polish his golf balls when he had a perfectly good setup at home.

z06boy
07-02-2010, 08:21 AM
hey, he shouldn't have let someone else polish his golf balls when he had a perfectly good setup at home.

...or shouldn't have gotten married in the first place...either one.

goof2
07-02-2010, 11:46 AM
I thought he had only made $800million or so up until this point.



That is more than half. He should send her swimming in the gulf instead.

I've heard a billion but she is getting much more than half because of the "Nordegren reportedly cannot say anything publicly about Tiger's extra marital affairs". This takes a ton of money out of her pocket. Without this she would probably get the largest payment for a single book deal ever.

Particle Man
07-02-2010, 12:18 PM
...or shouldn't have gotten married in the first place...either one.

I like your answer better :lol:

Smittie61984
07-02-2010, 12:19 PM
I'm sure she had this planned from the get go. No suprise

azoomm
07-02-2010, 12:26 PM
I'm sure she had this planned from the get go. No suprise

Right. SHE planned And plotted for him to cheat on her... ok.

Smittie61984
07-02-2010, 12:31 PM
Right. SHE planned And plotted for him to cheat on her... ok.

It's not that hard to figure out. Decent looking guy, multi-millionare, super-star who travels the world. It was a matter of time and I'm sure she was waiting to cash in and she hit the jackpot.

And she was in it for the money. If Tiger Woods was waiting tables or even some $80k a year adminstrative worker at some company she wouldn't have even looked at him.

Kaneman
07-02-2010, 01:48 PM
Right. SHE planned And plotted for him to cheat on her... ok.

That's actually what I've suspected since the beginning, though I realize you're being sarcastic.

The payout is disgusting and should be illegal. She didn't earn one cent of that, and she's a dirty fucking thief. Personally, I hope she chokes on it.

Kaneman
07-02-2010, 01:49 PM
It's not that hard to figure out. Decent looking guy, multi-millionare, super-star who travels the world. It was a matter of time and I'm sure she was waiting to cash in and she hit the jackpot.

And she was in it for the money. If Tiger Woods was waiting tables or even some $80k a year adminstrative worker at some company she wouldn't have even looked at him.

Totally agree. She's worse than any actual whore.

EpyonXero
07-02-2010, 01:53 PM
I knew it was hard to keep a woman quiet, but $750M is crazy.

goof2
07-02-2010, 05:50 PM
That's actually what I've suspected since the beginning, though I realize you're being sarcastic.

The payout is disgusting and should be illegal. She didn't earn one cent of that, and she's a dirty fucking thief. Personally, I hope she chokes on it.

And he makes tons of money in large part based on his public image. If he hadn't of voluntarily shit all over it, and his family in the process, he wouldn't be voluntarily stroking a check for three quarters of a billion dollars to try and stop the bleeding. The reality is if he isn't able to get his game back this will be nothing compared to the future earnings he will have cost himself.

I knew it was hard to keep a woman quiet, but $750M is crazy.

The crazier the stuff is a woman can't talk about the more it is going to cost.

Mudpuppy
07-02-2010, 06:35 PM
who fucking cares?

$750m would buy a lot of professional whores that would keep their fucking mouth shut..

the guy is a fucking idiot and the story bores me..

Gas Man
07-02-2010, 09:59 PM
who fucking cares?

$750m would buy a lot of professional whores that would keep their fucking mouth shut..

the guy is a fucking idiot and the story bores me..
Quoted for truth and awesomeness!!!

TommyHotWheel
07-02-2010, 11:05 PM
Looks like its gonna be closer to $100 mil.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/golf/tigerwoods/7869437/Tiger-Woods-wife-will-get-100-million-in-divorce.html

Probably well worth it to him.

Rangerscott
07-02-2010, 11:58 PM
Caption this.


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01581/tiger2_1581550c.jpg

CrazyKell
07-05-2010, 10:45 AM
It's not that hard to figure out. Decent looking guy, multi-millionare, super-star who travels the world. It was a matter of time and I'm sure she was waiting to cash in and she hit the jackpot.

And she was in it for the money. If Tiger Woods was waiting tables or even some $80k a year adminstrative worker at some company she wouldn't have even looked at him.

What? :scratch:

You think Tiger was going after some chick waiting tables?

She's a hot model so he epitomizes the stereo type too.

He fucked up and now he's paying. :shrug:

Kaneman
07-05-2010, 10:49 AM
He fucked up and now he's paying. :shrug:

So people who leave their cars unlocked deserve to get them stolen?

CrazyKell
07-05-2010, 10:55 AM
So people who leave their cars unlocked deserve to get them stolen?

Yes we can totally draw a parallel between someone who leaves their car unlocked and someone who commits mitigated adultery time after time. That is fair.

Kaneman
07-05-2010, 11:03 AM
Yes we can totally draw a parallel between someone who leaves their car unlocked and someone who commits mitigated adultery time after time. That is fair.

You're saying that making a mistake justifies being stolen from, and that's what I'm illustrating.

What if I go over to fuck my mistress, leave my car unlocked, then get my car stolen. Does my infidelity absolve the thief of his crime?

Papa_Complex
07-05-2010, 11:03 AM
So people who leave their cars unlocked deserve to get them stolen?

Taking the absolute best case for Tiger: People who do drug deals run the risk of getting jacked.

Kaneman
07-05-2010, 11:05 AM
Taking the absolute best case for Tiger: People who do drug deals run the risk of getting jacked.

So if you want to steal without being a thief you should only steal from drug dealers or buyers?

CrazyKell
07-05-2010, 11:05 AM
You're saying that making a mistake justifies being stolen from, and that's what I'm illustrating.

What if I go over to fuck my mistress, leave my car unlocked, then get my car stolen. Does my infidelity absolve the thief of his crime?


Nowhere did I say that anything justifies anything. I simply stated the fact that he made a mistake (didn't even say what it was as some would argue it was the infidelity and others would argue it was the getting caught) and the other fact is that now he is paying for that mistake.

I personally believe that he shouldn't have gotten married or had kids in the first place. Or he should've married someone that was okay with the gross level of infidelity he displayed. :shrug:

Now if his car got broken into while he was commiting the adultery....well that's a whole other story. :lmao:

Kaneman
07-05-2010, 11:06 AM
Nowhere did I say that anything justifies anything. I simply stated the fact that he made a mistake (didn't even say what it was as some would argue it was the infidelity and others would argue it was the getting caught) and the other fact is that now he is paying for that mistake.

I personally believe that he shouldn't have gotten married or had kids in the first place. Or he should've married someone that was okay with the gross level of infidelity he displayed. :shrug:

Now if his car got broken into while he was commiting the adultery....well that's a whole other story. :lmao:

But this thread is about the payout, not about the original infidelity. And since we're discussing the payout, I want her called out for the money-grubbing, thieving, whore she is. That's all.

Papa_Complex
07-05-2010, 11:10 AM
So if you want to steal without being a thief you should only steal from drug dealers or buyers?

OK, how about the simple reality then. This isn't theft; it's a breach of contract case. Woods made a deal. He failed to abide by the contract that he signed. He now pays the penalties for that breach. It's really that simple.

If you can't abide by the terms of a contract, don't sign it.

CrazyKell
07-05-2010, 11:11 AM
Isn't the whole situation kind of one big clusterfuck? How could you possibly extricate the payout from the original sin? The reason the payout is so high is because this isn't just your typical "irreconcilable differences" kind of divorce.

Amber Lamps
07-05-2010, 11:12 AM
Yes we can totally draw a parallel between someone who leaves their car unlocked and someone who commits mitigated adultery time after time. That is fair.

I agree that those that cheat on their spouses deserve to be punished, quite frankly, it should still be illegal. That being said, I don't agree with all this monetary payout stuff. $100,000,000? That's ridiculous. Maybe if she had taught him how to play golf or something but exactly how was she instrumental is his earning of wealth? If they started a business together, maybe but he was already rich when they met. I've never believed that an adult deserves to be paid by the other adult after a divorce... she should go get a job. He has already supported her in the lap of luxury for however long they have been together, she hasn't worked akaik. She has gotten all of her needs fulfilled and her wishes granted. Heck, if you want to do a financial analysis of the situation, she owes him money!:lol: Of course you all realize that this doesn't include whatever the child support is going to be.... Fixed and single is where it's at, baby!!!

Kaneman
07-05-2010, 11:14 AM
OK, how about the simple reality then. This isn't theft; it's a breach of contract case. Woods made a deal. He failed to abide by the contract that he signed. He now pays the penalties for that breach. It's really that simple.

If you can't abide by the terms of a contract, don't sign it.

Bullshit. She has the choice to do the right thing and not steal something she did nothing for.

Isn't the whole situation kind of one big clusterfuck? How could you possibly extricate the payout from the original sin? The reason the payout is so high is because this isn't just your typical "irreconcilable differences" kind of divorce.

Doesn't make a bit of difference. She's taking what she didn't earn, that's stealing.

I'm not saying she's broken a law and deserves to be in jail. I'm saying that deep in her heart, she's a thief and a whore. Stealing $100 million dollars is a much worse action than fucking a bunch of willing women.

Kaneman
07-05-2010, 11:16 AM
I agree that those that cheat on their spouses deserve to be punished, quite frankly, it should still be illegal. That being said, I don't agree with all this monetary payout stuff. $100,000,000? That's ridiculous. Maybe if she had taught him how to play golf or something but exactly how was she instrumental is his earning of wealth? If they started a business together, maybe but he was already rich when they met. I've never believed that an adult deserves to be paid by the other adult after a divorce... she should go get a job. He has already supported her in the lap of luxury for however long they have been together, she hasn't worked akaik. She has gotten all of her needs fulfilled and her wishes granted. Heck, if you want to do a financial analysis of the situation, she owes him money!:lol: Of course you all realize that this doesn't include whatever the child support is going to be.... Fixed and single is where it's at, baby!!!

Wait, we already put more people in jail than any other country....and you want to jail people for infidelity? :lol:

CrazyKell
07-05-2010, 11:30 AM
Doesn't make a bit of difference. She's taking what she didn't earn, that's stealing.

I'm not saying she's broken a law and deserves to be in jail. I'm saying that deep in her heart, she's a thief and a whore. Stealing $100 million dollars is a much worse action than fucking a bunch of willing women.

Since when are people ever paid what they really earned? :scratch:

And I doubt any of this is coming from her. She has a team that is more than likely fighting tooth and nail for this whole thing.

The only thing I can think is that she might need a lot of money to have security, etc. I'm not justifying it, I'm just saying that she has been thrust into the spotlight and might want to protect the kids too.

He's ugly. She's hot. He was the provider. So now he's going to provide for the rest of her life. Not necessarily right, but looks like it's going that way.

Amber Lamps
07-05-2010, 11:46 AM
Wait, we already put more people in jail than any other country....and you want to jail people for infidelity? :lol:

Okay, as with all of these types of discussions, you have two choices, you can argue for the way things are or for the way you wish they were. When dealing with a discussion/debate I normally choose to debate for the way I wish things were. Besides, there are many other punishments besides imprisonment. How about a big red "A" tattooed on the forehead? Public lashing? Adulterers database like child molesters? Banning from ever getting remarried? I don't agree with the payout to her. She's been displayed as the innocent little angel but we don't know that. She must have known about this problem from the start, how could she not? Heck, he was probably cheating on someone else with her! She knew he needed an abnormal amount of sex, perhaps she purposely without sex from him until he cheated? Besides, the brother is half black and half Chinese, black guys are CHRONIC cheaters and there's a reason why China has the world's largest population...:lol:

Papa_Complex
07-05-2010, 11:47 AM
Bullshit. She has the choice to do the right thing and not steal something she did nothing for.

He had the choice to not sign the contract. He had the choice (apparently many timers) not to act in a way that put him in default of that contract. He had the choice not to have kids that deserve to be kept in the lifestyle that they were raised to expect. He had a bunch of choices. It's his own fault that he made the wrong ones, knowing what the consequences could be.

... and isn't that what so many people on this board espouse; personal responsibility?

Amber Lamps
07-05-2010, 11:54 AM
He had the choice to not sign the contract. He had the choice (apparently many timers) not to act in a way that put him in default of that contract. He had the choice not to have kids that deserve to be kept in the lifestyle that they were raised to expect. He had a bunch of choices. It's his own fault that he made the wrong ones, knowing what the consequences could be.

... and isn't that what so many people on this board espouse; personal responsibility?

He is still going to pay an astronomical amount in child support on top of this payout.:panic:

azoomm
07-05-2010, 12:12 PM
He had the choice to not sign the contract. He had the choice (apparently many timers) not to act in a way that put him in default of that contract. He had the choice not to have kids that deserve to be kept in the lifestyle that they were raised to expect. He had a bunch of choices. It's his own fault that he made the wrong ones, knowing what the consequences could be.

... and isn't that what so many people on this board espouse; personal responsibility?
THIS is what I agree with.

Whatever her involvement or intentions, he made choices.

Amber Lamps
07-05-2010, 12:22 PM
THIS is what I agree with.

Whatever her involvement or intentions, he made choices.

Oh I agree but this is ridiculous! Alimony was initially invented to help support the poor, weak, helpless women who were cast aside by heartless men, get back on their feet after a divorce but now it's turned into a punishment tool. That's not what it was intended to be.

Let's try this, what if they were getting a divorce just because they couldn't get along. Should she still get a bunch of money? She still did the same amount of "work", she still put the same time in, has the same kids....now what?

What if she had been the one to cheat? Should she get nothing? What about the kids now? What if there weren't any kids, does she still "deserve" money?

He should take care of his kids, period, she can take care of herself... Heck, the child support would probably be more than all of us put together make anyway.:lol:

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 12:32 PM
Yes we can totally draw a parallel between someone who leaves their car unlocked and someone who commits mitigated adultery time after time. That is fair.

So she is entitled to a divorce. What makes women think they are entitled to half of what the guy has? Because a court says so or because she WAS in it for the cash. Just looking for a payout IMO...like all the other golddiggers.

If she truely just wanted out of it, she would divorce and let him keep his money.

RACER X
07-05-2010, 12:37 PM
I agree that those that cheat on their spouses deserve to be punished, quite frankly, it should still be illegal.

i think it is illegal in alot of states still, just not prosecuted. heard of some cases recently where they are being charged w/ adultry.

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/woman-charged-adultery-challenge-york-law/story?id=10857437

"Suzanne M. Corona of Batavia, N.Y., became only the 13th person in the history of New York to be charged with adultery when she was arrested last Friday along with Justin Amend"

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 12:37 PM
OK, how about the simple reality then. This isn't theft; it's a breach of contract case. Woods made a deal. He failed to abide by the contract that he signed. He now pays the penalties for that breach. It's really that simple.

If you can't abide by the terms of a contract, don't sign it.


And what contract do you speak of? There was no prenup, right?

The only contract they broke was if they swore before God to be together until death. Other than that, no contract was breached.

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 12:40 PM
Isn't the whole situation kind of one big clusterfuck? How could you possibly extricate the payout from the original sin? The reason the payout is so high is because this isn't just your typical "irreconcilable differences" kind of divorce.

Come on seriously...the payout is so large because (just like the government touts) he CAN pay it.

It's bullshit...100%.

RACER X
07-05-2010, 12:40 PM
so does tiger hold any blame?

azoomm
07-05-2010, 12:44 PM
Oh I agree but this is ridiculous! Alimony was initially invented to help support the poor, weak, helpless women who were cast aside by heartless men, get back on their feet after a divorce but now it's turned into a punishment tool. That's not what it was intended to be.

Let's try this, what if they were getting a divorce just because they couldn't get along. Should she still get a bunch of money? She still did the same amount of "work", she still put the same time in, has the same kids....now what?

What if she had been the one to cheat? Should she get nothing? What about the kids now? What if there weren't any kids, does she still "deserve" money?

He should take care of his kids, period, she can take care of herself... Heck, the child support would probably be more than all of us put together make anyway.:lol:

I agree it's ridiculous. I agree it's all vulgar. I mean, it's a gross amount of money that many of us can't even comprehend. It's a shit ton of zeros.

It's why they all have lawyers when entering into anything. I'm quite sure both of them are sitting back and letting someone else do their dirty work to make sure what happens is "fair."

Being his wife might not seem like work - but, with some of the bullshit she has to put up with [security, fans, media, etc.] it's probably not a walk in the park either. Does it deserve a million dollar payday? Probably not. But, it's now what this society dictates. HE knew what he was getting into. He probably won't cry over the loss of one zero... and might learn that he doesn't want to do this again.

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 12:47 PM
....He's ugly. She's hot. .....

So a model marries an ugly dude for love.....or for money. Think about it.

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 12:51 PM
i think it is illegal in alot of states still, just not prosecuted. heard of some cases recently where they are being charged w/ adultry.

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/woman-charged-adultery-challenge-york-law/story?id=10857437

"Suzanne M. Corona of Batavia, N.Y., became only the 13th person in the history of New York to be charged with adultery when she was arrested last Friday along with Justin Amend"


This just goes to show that marriage should only be recognized by the church. The government should only uphold civil unions where children are involved.

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 12:53 PM
so does tiger hold any blame?

He needs to support his children., not her.

And yes...he is to blame....and the punishment should be handed down from the one that made it against the law in the first place.

Homeslice
07-05-2010, 01:18 PM
And she was in it for the money. If Tiger Woods was waiting tables or even some $80k a year adminstrative worker at some company she wouldn't have even looked at him.

Truth.

Models/actresses like her don't think a guy is "qualified" to date them unless he is loaded or famous. That is their first criteria when looking for a man.........Not whether they actually click with him.

CrazyKell
07-05-2010, 01:20 PM
Truth.

Models/actresses like her don't think a man is "qualified" to be with them unless they are loaded or famous. That is their first criteria when looking for a man.........Not whether they actually click.

You guys are funny.

You think Tiger cared whether they clicked or not? Ugly rich dude bags a model.....classic story from BOTH sides.

Quit it with the woman hating you guys. :lol

defector
07-05-2010, 01:21 PM
And what contract do you speak of? There was no prenup, right?

The only contract they broke was if they swore before God to be together until death. Other than that, no contract was breached.

I think I heard on ESPN that there was a prenup of a guarantee of 20 mil up to the first 10 yrs of marriage. The number went up from there for each year.

Or, as it seems to me, for each admitted case of cheating.

Homeslice
07-05-2010, 01:24 PM
So people who leave their cars unlocked deserve to get them stolen?

That seems to be the mentality here.........There was a thread about finding a wallet on the street, most people here said it was finders keepers and that they deserved to lose the money :rolleyes:

Homeslice
07-05-2010, 01:26 PM
Ugly rich dude bags a model.....


Exactly my point.......She was only in it for the money.

How often do you see a very attractive man married to an ugly rich woman? You don't, because men don't stoop to those levels. We can make our own money. Plus we aren't as comfortable sitting around doing nothing, the way most golddiggers do.

Papa_Complex
07-05-2010, 02:03 PM
And what contract do you speak of? There was no prenup, right?

The only contract they broke was if they swore before God to be together until death. Other than that, no contract was breached.

After the initial story broke, there was much made about a prenup. Barring that, though, there certainly was a contract. As far as The State is concerned, they had a mutually beneficial contract in place.

Papa_Complex
07-05-2010, 02:20 PM
Truth.

Models/actresses like her don't think a guy is "qualified" to date them unless he is loaded or famous. That is their first criteria when looking for a man.........Not whether they actually click with him.

IIRC when they first met she wasn't a model; she was an au pair for the family of a friend.

That seems to be the mentality here.........There was a thread about finding a wallet on the street, most people here said it was finders keepers and that they deserved to lose the money :rolleyes:

I promise you that if I swear, I'll always drop a quarter in the swear jar for you.

Fuck you. No quarter.

Homeslice
07-05-2010, 02:24 PM
IIRC when they first met she wasn't a model; she was an au pair for the family of a friend.



If a woman with those kind of looks was an au pair, then her real reason for coming over here was to break into modeling or entertainment

Particle Man
07-05-2010, 02:31 PM
I give it 10 years and then shell write a book, terms be damned.

Kaneman
07-05-2010, 02:41 PM
I just can't get over what a fucking whore she is, yet still manages to get portrayed as a victim.

It is amusing how society views women who fuck for money. Like, if you only get $100 to fuck then you're a whore and go to jail, but if you get $100,000,000 in a divorce you're a victim. :lol:

Fucking Dirty Thieving Whore.

Amber Lamps
07-05-2010, 02:53 PM
And what contract do you speak of? There was no prenup, right?

The only contract they broke was if they swore before God to be together until death. Other than that, no contract was breached.

To a lot of people marriage IS a contract...:idk:

RACER X
07-05-2010, 03:00 PM
Wonder if she has small feet? Lol

goof2
07-05-2010, 03:22 PM
I think I heard on ESPN that there was a prenup of a guarantee of 20 mil up to the first 10 yrs of marriage. The number went up from there for each year.

Or, as it seems to me, for each admitted case of cheating.

There is a prenup but it looks like Tiger is willing to throw it out in order to buy her silence.

On a separate note, nobody put Tiger in this position except himself. If he hadn't chosen to 1) get married, 2) have kids, and 3) continue to bang every skank with a pulse he could find he wouldn't be in this position. Hell, if Tiger had just had a regular affair like normal people he wouldn't need to trash the prenup to keep Elin quiet. The responsibility for having to stroke that 9 figure check rests squarely on his shoulders alone.

CrazyKell
07-05-2010, 03:29 PM
There is a prenup but it looks like Tiger is willing to throw it out in order to buy her silence.

On a separate note, nobody put Tiger in this position except himself. If he hadn't chosen to 1) get married, 2) have kids, and 3) continue to bang every skank with a pulse he could find he wouldn't be in this position. Hell, if Tiger had just had a regular affair like normal people he wouldn't need to trash the prenup to keep Elin quiet. The responsibility for having to stroke that 9 figure check rests squarely on his shoulders alone.

Well that kind of logic just won't be tolerated around here. Where's your mysoginistic hat when you need it? :wtfru::lol

Particle Man
07-05-2010, 03:41 PM
Wonder if she has small feet? Lol

:lol: well done

Papa_Complex
07-05-2010, 03:45 PM
If a woman with those kind of looks was an au pair, then her real reason for coming over here was to break into modeling or entertainment

... or to marry a guy who she met, and fell in love with. There are an awful lot of good looking people who routinely come to North America from elsewhere, but don't go into modelling or entertainment.

Smittie61984
07-05-2010, 04:01 PM
And he makes tons of money in large part based on his public image. If he hadn't of voluntarily shit all over it...


Then he should stroke a check to his sponsors, the ones who really are affected by his trashed reputation.

He does need to pay for his kids. Her on the other hand is on her own. If she wants $100million because she is accustomed to a lavish lifestyle then Tiger Woods should still be able to fuck her at least once. He was suppose to provide money for her and she was suppose provide the pussy.

Now I will admit that Tiger Woods was a dumbass for thinking that a Super Model loved him and not his money.

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 06:01 PM
Exactly my point.......She was only in it for the money.

How often do you see a very attractive man married to an ugly rich woman? You don't, because men don't stoop to those levels. We can make our own money. Plus we aren't as comfortable sitting around doing nothing, the way most golddiggers do.

:lol Dude I love your posts.

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 06:06 PM
To a lot of people marriage IS a contract...:idk:

Marriage is only acknowledged by a license...unless you get a prenup. I'm sure most people don't get married then have a verbal contract that if one or the other cheats, the spouse gets half. Not happening dude.

I just can't get over what a fucking whore she is, yet still manages to get portrayed as a victim.

It is amusing how society views women who fuck for money. Like, if you only get $100 to fuck then you're a whore and go to jail, but if you get $100,000,000 in a divorce you're a victim. :lol:

Fucking Dirty Thieving Whore.

:lol True!!

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 06:09 PM
There is a prenup but it looks like Tiger is willing to throw it out in order to buy her silence.

On a separate note, nobody put Tiger in this position except himself. If he hadn't chosen to 1) get married, 2) have kids, and 3) continue to bang every skank with a pulse he could find he wouldn't be in this position. Hell, if Tiger had just had a regular affair like normal people he wouldn't need to trash the prenup to keep Elin quiet. The responsibility for having to stroke that 9 figure check rests squarely on his shoulders alone.

This thread is about the amount of the settlement, not whether he cheated or shouldn't have gotton married etc. etc. He is to blame, but is he 100 million to blame? Uhhhh..no.

101lifts2
07-05-2010, 06:10 PM
....Now I will admit that Tiger Woods was a dumbass for thinking that a Super Model loved him and not his money.

Remember the horny side of Woods is black. :lol

Rangerscott
07-05-2010, 06:17 PM
Bitches be expensive. I've been around divorces. When I hear a woman say they would never take anything from a man if they got divorce, I laugh my head off. Dumb bitches.

goof2
07-05-2010, 06:18 PM
This thread is about the amount of the settlement, not whether he cheated or shouldn't have gotton married etc. etc. He is to blame, but is he 100 million to blame? Uhhhh..no.

This thread has been about a lot of stuff. Tiger is throwing out his prenup and voluntarily paying more than he has to so his soon to be ex-wife will stay quiet. Tiger appears to disagree with you.

Papa_Complex
07-05-2010, 06:19 PM
Bitches be expensive. I've been around divorces. When I hear a woman say they would never take anything from a man if they got divorce, I laugh my head off. Dumb bitches.

They'd have to be dumb. Those would be the ones who are married to the guys who have nothing to take.

Apoc
07-05-2010, 06:48 PM
You guys are funny.

You think Tiger cared whether they clicked or not? Ugly rich dude bags a model.....classic story from BOTH sides.

Quit it with the woman hating you guys. :lol



Now to be fair, I wouldn't say Tiger is an 'Ugly rich dude'. The man stays in better shape then 99.9% of the world. Its not like she married Donald Trump.

They probably got along quite well before they were married. I'm sure she didnt know he was cheating when they got married.

That said, she doesnt deserve anymore then 100 million, and maybe one of his yachts.

But now that she's alone, this ugly poor dude would love to take care of her needs.

Apoc
07-05-2010, 06:54 PM
IIRC when they first met she wasn't a model; she was an au pair for the family of a friend.



.

She was already a model, and also a nanny for a PGA golfer, Jesper Parnevik, whose wife is also a model, and a close friend of Elins.

Papa_Complex
07-05-2010, 07:25 PM
Apparently she didn't get a chance to do much modelling, or she wouldn't have needed to work as an au pair or in retail. A magazine cover and some catalogue work doesn't make for a career.

Smittie61984
07-05-2010, 08:39 PM
Remember the horny side of Woods is black. :lol

I guess his vehicle driving skills came from the other half.

RACER X
07-06-2010, 11:37 AM
Remember the horny side of Woods is black. :lol



I guess his vehicle driving skills came from the other half.

:lol

but unforn. that would be stereotyping.....see police w/ tat thread.......hmmm.......double standards.