PDA

View Full Version : Someone took pot-shots at The Pentagon?

Papa_Complex
10-19-2010, 01:35 PM
... and apparently it's common enough that no one posted it here?

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/10/19/dc.pentagon.shots.fired/index.html?hpt=T2
shmike
10-19-2010, 01:46 PM
It's not that it is common.

It's just that it can't be traced to the Tea Partiers or blamed on Bush so it hasn't registered on pauldun's or Avatard's "must post" lists.

Yet.
Homeslice
10-19-2010, 01:49 PM
Maybe not common, but not concerning IMO.

Probably just some guy who used to get off by shooting BB's at his neighbors houses.

Not worth wasting tons of taxpayer money investigating. But of course, they will, because none of them have the guts to speak up and say it's not a big deal.
pauldun170
10-19-2010, 02:11 PM
It's not that it is common.

It's just that it can't be traced to the Tea Partiers or blamed on Bush so it hasn't registered on pauldun's or Avatard's "must post" lists.

Yet.

Asshole...I was beating off to 2r2c again.
I gotta have my "me" time you know...
derf
10-19-2010, 02:17 PM
It's not that it is common.



It happens once or twice a year
Apoc
10-19-2010, 03:51 PM
Hmmm... I dunno. If im gonna shoot at something, it probably aint gonna be the pentagon, where there *might* be armed soldiers and cops at every fucking turn for the next 5 miles.
Papa_Complex
10-19-2010, 05:51 PM
Hmmm... I dunno. If im gonna shoot at something, it probably aint gonna be the pentagon, where there *might* be armed soldiers and cops at every fucking turn for the next 5 miles.

Admittedly the expression, "RETURN FIRE!" did come to mind.
Apoc
10-19-2010, 06:03 PM
Admittedly the expression, "RETURN FIRE!" did come to mind.

Well, I would think if you'd pull out a gun near the Pentagon, which pretty much is the National Defence HQ, they'd be able to find you fairly quickly...

And I mean, theres gotta be a camera or two nearby.
Papa_Complex
10-19-2010, 06:10 PM
Well, I would think if you'd pull out a gun near the Pentagon, which pretty much is the National Defence HQ, they'd be able to find you fairly quickly...

And I mean, theres gotta be a camera or two nearby.

And yet they missed a 757 running into the wall.
Apoc
10-19-2010, 06:37 PM
And yet they missed a 757 running into the wall.

meh, at least 757 is so big its nearly impossible to stop without getting jets in the air in a matter of seconds. And its hard to bring it down faster when its already accomplishing that feat on its own.
Papa_Complex
10-19-2010, 06:50 PM
meh, at least 757 is so big its nearly impossible to stop without getting jets in the air in a matter of seconds. And its hard to bring it down faster when its already accomplishing that feat on its own.

I don't mean that they missed shooting it down. I mean that they seem to have missed getting a single clear picture of it hitting the building. It's one of the things that fuels the conspiracy whack-jobs.
Apoc
10-19-2010, 08:07 PM
I don't mean that they missed shooting it down. I mean that they seem to have missed getting a single clear picture of it hitting the building. It's one of the things that fuels the conspiracy whack-jobs.

I actually didnt know this.
goof2
10-19-2010, 08:10 PM
I actually didnt know this.

Search for pentagon missile 9/11 and you will quickly know too much about it.
Homeslice
10-19-2010, 09:44 PM
I don't mean that they missed shooting it down. I mean that they seem to have missed getting a single clear picture of it hitting the building. It's one of the things that fuels the conspiracy whack-jobs.

As I recall, they confiscated video from some nearby businesses, and never showed it to anyone.
RedRider2k2
10-19-2010, 10:04 PM
As I recall, they confiscated video from some nearby businesses, and never showed it to anyone.

That's what I understood. Which is why It never made sense. If they had footage, releasing just a couple of frames would shut most doubters up. The rest would just have new material to work with.
Papa_Complex
10-20-2010, 06:34 AM
As I recall, they confiscated video from some nearby businesses, and never showed it to anyone.

Perhaps because there was nothing to show? There would be no reason NOT to release video of a commercial aircraft hitting the Pentagon, that I can think of, apart from basic propriety. In other words if the video was out there, the media would show it, and it shows a 189 people dying.
Particle Man
10-20-2010, 11:40 AM
Perhaps because there was nothing to show? There would be no reason NOT to release video of a commercial aircraft hitting the Pentagon, that I can think of, apart from basic propriety. In other words if the video was out there, the media would show it, and it shows a 189 people dying.The whole "national security" thing about publishing what is essentially a users-guide to that building's weaknesses...

(not saying I agree or disagree here)
Mudpuppy
10-20-2010, 01:54 PM
or a missile
Papa_Complex
10-20-2010, 02:21 PM
or a missile

Like the one that the conspiracy video "shows" being "launched" by the second plane that hit the towers?
LeeNetworX
10-20-2010, 02:25 PM
http://www.heartlessdoll.com/gorilla.jpg
Homeslice
10-20-2010, 02:29 PM
^ :lol:
goof2
10-20-2010, 03:03 PM
http://www.heartlessdoll.com/gorilla.jpg

Nice.:lol:
KSGregman
10-20-2010, 03:10 PM
http://www.heartlessdoll.com/gorilla.jpg

Hahahaha...I wonder if that guy is still living in his bunker? Talk about having a tin foil hat on too tight.... :lmao:
Particle Man
10-20-2010, 03:17 PM
http://www.heartlessdoll.com/gorilla.jpg

:lol
Mudpuppy
10-20-2010, 03:59 PM
Like the one that the conspiracy video "shows" being "launched" by the second plane that hit the towers?

haven't seen that but yes..
Homeslice
10-20-2010, 05:02 PM
Hahahaha...I wonder if that guy is still living in his bunker? Talk about having a tin foil hat on too tight.... :lmao:
How about the idiots who didn't believe he was zeronetgain? :lmao: