An Interview With a Target of the FBI’s Anonymous Probe

[pauldun170]

http://gawker.com/#!5757995/an-interview-with-a-target-of-the-fbis-anonymous-probe

[JoshuaTree]

The Committee for State Security does not appreciate you disclosing their operations and assisting with spreading such clear disinformation.

Your papers, please...


:poke:

[Homeslice]

Link failure

[Papa_Complex]

Link works fine. Cliff Notes; 19 year old female IRC channel mod says, "They ain't got nuttin'"

[Homeslice]

Link does nothing but re-direct to gawker's home page for me.

[Papa_Complex]

Then just scroll down the page and click on "An Interview With a Target of the FBI's Anonymous Probe"

[derf]

Summary: the fbi was able to track a irc moderator to her house, thinks she is an anonymous leader. Her father kicks her out. She plays dumb because all she did was moderate a forum

[Homeslice]

Then just scroll down the page and click on "An Interview With a Target of the FBI's Anonymous Probe"


Doesn't exist, and I scrolled thru 3 pages.

[Papa_Complex]

Doesn't exist, and I scrolled thru 3 pages.

You have obviously been hacked by Anonymous.

http://gawker.com/#!5757995/an-interview-with-a-target-of-the-fbis-anonymous-probe

[Amber Lamps]

Doesn't exist, and I scrolled thru 3 pages.

I found it, the girl is a twit and I hope that they fry her.

[derf]

I found it, the girl is a twit and I hope that they fry her.

I wonder if she's cute

[Amber Lamps]

I wonder if she's cute

Maybe but I doubt it, fat emo type is my guess...

[derf]

Well that answers that question. Next story please

[goof2]

I found it, the girl is a twit and I hope that they fry her.

She most certainly comes across as a twit, but that is not illegal. The millions of twits currently running free serve as proof. She only deserves to be "fried" if they can prove she broke the law.:shrug:

[Papa_Complex]

She most certainly comes across as a twit, but that is not illegal. The millions of twits currently running free serve as proof. She only deserves to be "fried" if they can prove she broke the law.:shrug:

I don't know about that. There is such a thing as facilitating a crime. If you provide the means by which a criminal conspiracy is hatched, and actively maintain control of that medium, are you not somewhat liable for the acts that follow?

[Amber Lamps]

She most certainly comes across as a twit, but that is not illegal. The millions of twits currently running free serve as proof. She only deserves to be "fried" if they can prove she broke the law.:shrug:

Um true, but she basically admits to being part of a conspiracy to do just that. If you and I conspire to murder Trip, even if only I pull the trigger, you are still guilty as well. What her group is doing, whether you agree with them or not, is illegal. When they attack company "A" or "B" they are also affecting all of the innocent employees of that company and anyone that might need to use their service. The funny thing for me is that the corporations that A fights are made up of all the little people that A claims to champion. No one "owns" Paypal or Mastercard, sure the CEO might get fired but another will just replace him. The people that are hurt are the drones that work there and the little old ladies that will lose retirement money when the stock falls.:wink:

[goof2]

I don't know about that. There is such a thing as facilitating a crime. If you provide the means by which a criminal conspiracy is hatched, and actively maintain control of that medium, are you not somewhat liable for the acts that follow?

Um true, but she basically admits to being part of a conspiracy to do just that. If you and I conspire to murder Trip, even if only I pull the trigger, you are still guilty as well. What her group is doing, whether you agree with them or not, is illegal. When they attack company "A" or "B" they are also affecting all of the innocent employees of that company and anyone that might need to use their service. The funny thing for me is that the corporations that A fights are made up of all the little people that A claims to champion. No one "owns" Paypal or Mastercard, sure the CEO might get fired but another will just replace him. The people that are hurt are the drones that work there and the little old ladies that will lose retirement money when the stock falls.:wink:

If they can prove she was a conspirator I'm fine with her being punished. Only hearing her side of the story (the only one presented in the story) I'm not sure her participation rose to that level. The Feds probably have a different view on the matter though.

AL, I agree with you about these "attacks". They seem misguided to me and the lack of support for Wikileaks serving as the motivation only reinforces my perception. I hope those who are involved in the "attacks" learn that the internet isn't quite as "Anonymous" as they like to think.

[Papa_Complex]

If they can prove she was a conspirator I'm fine with her being punished. Only hearing her side of the story (the only one presented in the story) I'm not sure her participation rose to that level. The Feds probably have a different view on the matter though.

AL, I agree with you about these "attacks". They seem misguided to me and the lack of support for Wikileaks serving as the motivation only reinforces my perception. I hope those who are involved in the "attacks" learn that the internet isn't quite as "Anonymous" as they like to think.

Lock your router and hide your SSID, or the FBI might end up mistaking 'them' for you.

[goof2]

Lock your router and hide your SSID, or the FBI might end up mistaking 'them' for you.

Weren't you arguing for her prosecution as a co-conspirator a few posts ago?:lol: As long as the standards of proof still hold I'm not particularly worried about me.

[Papa_Complex]

Weren't you arguing for her prosecution as a co-conspirator a few posts ago?:lol: As long as the standards of proof still hold I'm not particularly worried about me.

She ADMITTED to facilitating illegal action, by stating that she helped provide the 'location' in which plans were made.

[Amorok]

Well, We've discussed some mildly questionable things on here, watch out, mods!

As for Anonymous, those guys are douchebags. When I was delivering pizza they were always internet ordering prank pizzas to the Scientology Reading Room in Biloxi. We would have to call every time an order came in there because they actually did order pizza quite a bit and were good tippers.

[goof2]

She ADMITTED to facilitating illegal action, by stating that she helped provide the 'location' in which plans were made.

I forgot about this thread. Lets see if what she did actually rises to the level of a conspirator. That is for a judge and a jury to determine, assuming charges are ever filed and it even gets that far.:shrug: