View Full Version : Hubless, spokeless chopper...
OneSickPsycho
01-26-2009, 10:37 PM
WAY cooler than when Billy Lane did it...
http://jalopnik.com/5139465/hubless-monster-motorcycle-rolls-without-spokes?skyline=true&s=i
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJPTSaARlvs
marko138
01-27-2009, 09:04 AM
Wicked.... Really strange looking as it rolls down the road.
BTW...love the shit you're posting lately. Keep up the good work.
njchopper87
01-27-2009, 03:41 PM
I like it too. Looks kinda like the bikes in video games.. in fact they should turn to games when they need new ideas for concept bikes.
Mr Lefty
01-27-2009, 04:15 PM
I see how they did the front... but can't see how they did the rear... bad ass though
Corey
01-27-2009, 04:30 PM
I see how they did the front... but can't see how they did the rear... bad ass though
Probably very similar to the front, with large components, of course. The drive mechanisms and the bulk parts are probably tucked away behind the modified fender thing to keep the lines clean and give it a more fluid look.
ceo012384
01-27-2009, 04:34 PM
I see how they did the front... but can't see how they did the rear... bad ass though
My guess is that they physically drive the rear tire itself, which is impractical and would increase tire wear heavily, methinks.
There are ways that I can think of to NOT do it that way but the pictures don't give away what they actually did here.
edit: since it's just a one-off chopper and probably barely ever gets ridden I would expect they took the easy way out and drive the tire like I said.
OneSickPsycho
01-27-2009, 08:52 PM
Wicked.... Really strange looking as it rolls down the road.
BTW...love the shit you're posting lately. Keep up the good work.
Well, it's mostly regurgitation from other forums, but I figured if I was sick of all the bullshit threads popping up all over the place I might as well contribute something worth clicking on.
My guess is that they physically drive the rear tire itself, which is impractical and would increase tire wear heavily, methinks.
There are ways that I can think of to NOT do it that way but the pictures don't give away what they actually did here.
edit: since it's just a one-off chopper and probably barely ever gets ridden I would expect they took the easy way out and drive the tire like I said.
It wasn't designed to be ridden, as stated in the article...
Quick281
01-28-2009, 07:38 AM
BTW...love the shit you're posting lately. Keep up the good work.
Aka, keep riding mini bikes behind bars.
Very cool looking bike.
marko138
01-28-2009, 09:00 AM
My guess is that they physically drive the rear tire itself, which is impractical and would increase tire wear heavily, methinks.
There are ways that I can think of to NOT do it that way but the pictures don't give away what they actually did here.
edit: since it's just a one-off chopper and probably barely ever gets ridden I would expect they took the easy way out and drive the tire like I said.
Damn you engineers. Dont worry about tire wear and shit....just appreciate.
Well, it's mostly regurgitation from other forums, but I figured if I was sick of all the bullshit threads popping up all over the place I might as well contribute something worth clicking on.
It wasn't designed to be ridden, as stated in the article...
Fuck it man...shit's new to me. Keep it coming.
Phenix_Rider
01-28-2009, 09:40 AM
Anyone else see Buell latching on to this idea? It's supposed to reduce unsprung weight :lol:
Try connecting 100+ HP to that though! You'd need a ZTL style sprocket, and think of that tooth count :panic:
OreoGaborio
01-29-2009, 02:52 PM
Now THAT'S what I call Fork Offset!
jalaan1
01-29-2009, 06:04 PM
looks alone A+
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.