PDA

View Full Version : June 09 POTM: Poll


Gas Man
06-02-2009, 02:10 AM
Bout time you guys put in a decent rep of pics...

Trip
http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u257/Ebbs15/Tripsgoofyass.jpg

Kerry 129
http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s85/kerry_129/2009-05%20TWFix%20Rally/IMG_0148.jpg

Derf
http://ebbs15.smugmug.com/photos/534195494_qeeHS-XL.jpg

Rae
http://ebbs15.smugmug.com/photos/535166375_AJYJ8-XL.jpg

Papa Complex
http://www.morallyambiguous.net/multimedia/gallery/galleries/090521-24_cmp/track/_thumbs/700x500-P5242238.JPG

rogue
http://www.twowheelfix.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4663&stc=1&thumb=1&d=1243315311

eBBs15
http://ebbs15.smugmug.com/photos/534188145_BfzSa-L.jpg

NtS
http://ebbs15.smugmug.com/photos/534226670_kuKLg-L.jpg

EricR
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v227/Braindamaged0386/TwFix%20Rally/DSC_0090.jpg

DLIT
06-02-2009, 02:17 AM
Papa. That HDR shit is getting played out.

Mr Lefty
06-02-2009, 07:00 AM
Papa. That HDR shit is getting played out.

not one of those is HDR...

Papa_Complex
06-02-2009, 08:58 AM
Papa. That HDR shit is getting played out.

That was a straight out of camera .jpg that was shot at 10:00am, with the light falling on the off-side of the bike. I don't like HDR. It's the wrong shot though. I was actually entering the other one ;)

*EDIT* Sorry, thought that was a comma not a period in your post. Ebbs' shots are extreme contrast and pin-hole effect, not HDR.

marko138
06-02-2009, 10:15 AM
Papa C FTW.

Sixxxxer
06-02-2009, 11:41 AM
LMAO...Gas...No Offense Boss but EricR is a Picture I took...And its one I submitted for Myself.

Papa. That HDR shit is getting played out.

Turns out thats Two Diff Sentences and he was Stating that HDR is getting played out so he voted for Papa...

DLIT
06-02-2009, 07:38 PM
Ya, I voted Papa, because whatever you call the other ones, that style is getting played out.

derf
06-02-2009, 07:54 PM
I actually want to kno who voted for me, I voted for Kerry.

Mr Lefty
06-02-2009, 08:14 PM
Ya, I voted Papa, because whatever you call the other ones, that style is getting played out.

D that's a different style than anything I've posted up before... Just fyi.. But yeah papa's Shot is pimp

DLIT
06-02-2009, 11:49 PM
D that's a different style than anything I've posted up before... Just fyi.. But yeah papa's Shot is pimp

Looks the same to me...pure gayness.

Gas Man
06-03-2009, 12:21 AM
LMAO...Gas...No Offense Boss but EricR is a Picture I took...And its one I submitted for Myself.


Yeah but I thought you were putting it in for eric... like ebbs was doing... we can give you credit if it wins.

marko138
06-03-2009, 07:37 AM
Lock this shit up. We've got a winner.

Mr Lefty
06-03-2009, 11:28 AM
Looks the same to me...pure gayness.

Lol if that looks the same as hdr to you... You need an eye exam. :lol:

Papa_Complex
06-03-2009, 12:24 PM
Lol if that looks the same as hdr to you... You need an eye exam. :lol:

I rather like it. There are times when the pushed contrast/pinhole effect just works.

http://www.morallyambiguous.net/multimedia/gallery/galleries/090321_f800st/_thumbs/700x500-P3216030.JPG

(Image posted as link, to avoid confusion)

Mr Lefty
06-03-2009, 08:06 PM
I rather like it. There are times when the pushed contrast/pinhole effect just works.

http://www.morallyambiguous.net/multimedia/gallery/galleries/090321_f800st/_thumbs/700x500-P3216030.JPG

(Image posted as link, to avoid confusion)

yeah I do to... I just fucked around with those... a bit over done for alot of people's taste... it's cool... I was just saying it looks nothing like HDR.

Papa_Complex
06-03-2009, 08:26 PM
yeah I do to... I just fucked around with those... a bit over done for alot of people's taste... it's cool... I was just saying it looks nothing like HDR.

I'm guessing that you've got a Photoshop action for those. I'm lucky; my latest camera has "art filters" and can do it with in-camera .JPG directly. I can use the preset and if I don't like the effect, then I've still got the RAW file to work with.

Mr Lefty
06-03-2009, 08:59 PM
I'm guessing that you've got a Photoshop action for those. I'm lucky; my latest camera has "art filters" and can do it with in-camera .JPG directly. I can use the preset and if I don't like the effect, then I've still got the RAW file to work with.

I got a lightroom preset. I shoot in RAW.... then do the conversions.

if ya got lightroom ya can get the presets I have here... http://www.presetsheaven.com/

Papa_Complex
06-04-2009, 10:50 AM
I don't use Lightroom. In fact I barely use photo editing software; Paint Shop Pro when I do. I'm more of a documentarian so most of my shots rarely get more than a subtle tweaking of the curves or a little unsharp mask. If you're dealing with a couple of thousand shots over the course of 3 days and have to get the best to the editor the same day that they're shot, then you learn to make do.

I had three shots published by a group based in England and while they all started as RAW files (I turf out the .JPGs shortly after the event), they were all developed with the in-camera settings. One got a run through Noiseware, because it was shot at ISO 800 on a heavily overcast day. That's it.

Mr Lefty
06-04-2009, 08:25 PM
ahh ok... yeah I need to be better about processing my photos right away.... even with a couple hundred I get lazy and they pile up.

I'm not out to win any awards with my photos... I'm more into figure'n out what looks intresting and what not... (funny I say that in a POTM thead:lol:) I don't really even look back at my old photos... most aren't really for memories... just a hoby.

the ones I keep for memories go unedited... cause they just get copied to a cd right away.

marko138
06-04-2009, 08:51 PM
I don't use Lightroom. In fact I barely use photo editing software; Paint Shop Pro when I do. I'm more of a documentarian so most of my shots rarely get more than a subtle tweaking of the curves or a little unsharp mask. If you're dealing with a couple of thousand shots over the course of 3 days and have to get the best to the editor the same day that they're shot, then you learn to make do.

I had three shots published by a group based in England and while they all started as RAW files (I turf out the .JPGs shortly after the event), they were all developed with the in-camera settings. One got a run through Noiseware, because it was shot at ISO 800 on a heavily overcast day. That's it.
I'm with ya, brother. Aside from HDR, I'm not a fan of touching up photos. I like to do it right the first time. And even the HDR, I dont like the super cartoonish looking HDR's.