Two Wheel Fix

Two Wheel Fix (http://www.twowheelfix.com/index.php)
-   Off Topic (http://www.twowheelfix.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   all drilling has stopped in the gulf (http://www.twowheelfix.com/showthread.php?t=14949)

azoomm 05-31-2010 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 378031)
i know exactly why. it had piss poor range, couldnt carry shit, and had limited charging options.

Of course....

and when the techology was purchased the continued development was stopped. You don't find that curious?

I'm just frustrated by the ignorance. My friends calling to boycott BP, the public that just freaks out on reaction, all of it. Knee-jerk is the WORST. No one wants it in their back yard, so they went somewhere else. I told y'all it would take months - that was my husband's estimate. Look at that, months...

Dave 05-31-2010 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azoomm (Post 378034)
Of course....

and when the techology was purchased the continued development was stopped. You don't find that curious?

I'm just frustrated by the ignorance. My friends calling to boycott BP, the public that just freaks out on reaction, all of it. Knee-jerk is the WORST. No one wants it in their back yard, so they went somewhere else. I told y'all it would take months - that was my husband's estimate. Look at that, months...

big oil's intent was most likely exactly what you think, however isint it far more likely that gm independantly decided that the car was not at that time viable/profitable and acted in its best interests to recoup losses and limit their liability?

im actually counting on morons pulling that, cant wait for local stations to cut prices

Sean 05-31-2010 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azoomm (Post 378034)
Of course....

and when the techology was purchased the continued development was stopped. You don't find that curious?

California dropped their ZEV mandate.

azoomm 05-31-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 378036)
big oil's intent was most likely exactly what you think, however isint it far more likely that gm independantly decided that the car was not at that time viable/profitable and acted in its best interests to recoup losses and limit their liability?

im actually counting on morons pulling that, cant wait for local stations to cut prices

Oh, I don't like tinfoil hats. I'm not a fan and don't look good in them :lol: I just find it really curious.

It was only introduced in LA. And then, the reason cited by GM was "lack of consumer interest." Even when EVERY driver that had one wanted to purchase and formed a coilition to stop the destruction of the cars. They offered GM more than retail in one big check for the remaining cars - to be turned down. All the cars were taken to GM's test track and crushed [where they still remain].

Back to the thread topic. I'm sad this happened to BP. It's part of the law of averages and something was BOUND to happen. They are the largest offshore agency in the world - if someone was going to have something happen, it would be them. It's also curious to me that Schlumberger and TransOcean aren't anywhere in the news.....

Sean 05-31-2010 12:50 PM

I see TransOcean all over the news. It was the "TransOcean rig owned by BP" for a while at the beginning.

Flexin 05-31-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azoomm (Post 378040)
Oh, I don't like tinfoil hats. I'm not a fan and don't look good in them :lol: I just find it really curious.

It was only introduced in LA. And then, the reason cited by GM was "lack of consumer interest." Even when EVERY driver that had one wanted to purchase and formed a coilition to stop the destruction of the cars. They offered GM more than retail in one big check for the remaining cars - to be turned down. All the cars were taken to GM's test track and crushed [where they still remain].

Back to the thread topic. I'm sad this happened to BP. It's part of the law of averages and something was BOUND to happen. They are the largest offshore agency in the world - if someone was going to have something happen, it would be them. It's also curious to me that Schlumberger and TransOcean aren't anywhere in the news.....

There is still one left but I think its just the body. I thing the engine, battery and so on were removed.

James

Dave 05-31-2010 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azoomm (Post 378040)
Oh, I don't like tinfoil hats. I'm not a fan and don't look good in them :lol: I just find it really curious.

It was only introduced in LA. And then, the reason cited by GM was "lack of consumer interest." Even when EVERY driver that had one wanted to purchase and formed a coilition to stop the destruction of the cars. They offered GM more than retail in one big check for the remaining cars - to be turned down. All the cars were taken to GM's test track and crushed [where they still remain].

Back to the thread topic. I'm sad this happened to BP. It's part of the law of averages and something was BOUND to happen. They are the largest offshore agency in the world - if someone was going to have something happen, it would be them. It's also curious to me that Schlumberger and TransOcean aren't anywhere in the news.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean (Post 378044)
I see TransOcean all over the news. It was the "TransOcean rig owned by BP" for a while at the beginning.

isint it a transocean rig leased by bp?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flexin (Post 378056)
There is still one left but I think its just the body. I thing the engine, battery and so on were removed.

James

there were a lot more than one survivor, a handful got handed to museums and at least one was restored to driveable status. i understand gm was rather upset about that but so would i if i was concerned id have to continue making parts for a car that cost 80 grand each to build

Rangerscott 05-31-2010 07:06 PM

When you've lived in the city that produces the most oil in Texas,.........................makes you wanna fucking own one of those companies. LOL


Wish I could find that funny clip of oil being like crack.

pdog 05-31-2010 08:19 PM

To be precise, pumping of existing wells is still happening. Exploratory drilling for new wells has been halted.

azoomm 05-31-2010 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pdog (Post 378125)
To be precise, pumping of existing wells is still happening. Exploratory drilling for new wells has been halted.

I did say drilling, right?

/looks up/ Yup, all drilling. Because drilling is the "dangerous" part.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.