Originally Posted by The Chi (Post 367670)

"They" say they dont do the procedures because a woman could change their mind and that when a woman reaches 25 they will consider it, but Dr's still refuse to do it until a woman is well beyond her child bearing years, making it often redundant. If you already have a child or 2, they will do it because you've had your children annd apparently its not until you have one that you know you dont want any. Or anymore.

Originally Posted by Trip (Post 367672)

There are mental ramifications to men, we have emotions and our experiences effect us contrary to popular stereotype.

This is all a power game, it's that simple. No one actually wants it to be "fair."

Originally Posted by azoomm (Post 367669)

Don't put your dick in the hole and you won't be any part of the equation.

Originally Posted by Trip (Post 367673)

It's the same reason abortion isn't really a viable solution, but this debate would need to be shifted to the war room for me to continue.

Originally Posted by Kaneman (Post 367676)

If chics didn't want to have to deal with different physical ramifications then they should've been born with dicks.

Originally Posted by azoomm (Post 367674)

No, I understand that.

But, you have ZERO physical ramifications. That is why it's skewed.

Originally Posted by Trip (Post 367681)

So what kind of risk would you give abortion? Is it only an option when life is at risk or is it an option whenever you just decide pregnancy just doesn't fit you? Either it is a viable solution with minimal risk or it is a destructive practice....

Originally Posted by The Chi (Post 367677)

You're not exactly correct Trip. The mental and physical ramifications on a woman on choosing whether or not to have a child a FAR MORE than they are for a man. This isnt something you can even argue as you pretty just wont ever know.