![]() |
Quote:
Cheapens the look of the car so much. I'm with Karl, and the very first response in this thread: Stock FTW. |
STOCK IS STOCK
therefore it sucks I wouldn't go back to stock, just cover it up or change for different aftermarket. I do agree on the "18 yr old civic" comment being a bad thing. |
Quote:
:lol: |
Quote:
|
I have seen some of the cars in that thread and while dim, you can see the lights. Its all about prep work and light coats. I also know that they were done over stock bulbs and that when done over L.E.D. lights the look is very cool, I will look later to see if I can find some pics.
|
mpsautosalvage.com specializes in wrecked mustangs. I've never gotten anything from them, but i've only heard good things.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm just razzin AL |
Tig, I don't don't know what the aversion is that you seem to have to the stock tail lights...this is, after all, a fucking Mustang we're talking about, and in the world of automotive design, the three vertical bars on the tail lights of a 'Stang are about as iconic as shit gets.
I gave you a link to some fresh, smoked stock designs...they'd even integrate well with the headlights you got there...but the tail lights on a 'Stang are just one of those things that if you fuck with it, it never quite looks right. You don't paint a smile on the Mona Lisa, because the mouth is what's special about that painting...dig? The lights are a defining character aspect of the Mustang's design. I can see refining it, massaging it, tweaking it a tad...but abandoning the iconic "3 vertical bar" thing is a vulgar move, and will never quite look "right" (again, strictly this man's opinion). |
Ok its hard to argue with that!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.