Quote:
Originally Posted by azoomm
Interesting development.
Our standard child waiver is two sided - one side is in [more] plain english and is to be signed by the minor. The other side is more complex and is to be signed by a Parent OR Legal Guardian. It is interesting to me, that a parent wouldn't be able to establish what they believe to be the best interest of the child - could it be that in this case it was a weekend-warrior father, and the child's mother [post divorce] is suing? I mean - it said:
So, the father isn't involved with the child's estate? Or, is the father just out money-grubbing after he signed for his child and found a loop-hole?
Certainly a case for me to watch....
|
I've been wondering if the "representative of the child's estate" was court appointed, or hired by one of the parents. I haven't seen any information in that regard.