So, because hormones during pregnancy cause developmental differences that's suppose to makes Darwin wrong? I wonder how many of those rocket scientist realize that hormones switch on and off sequences of DNA?
Quote:
Originally Posted by smileyman
Science creates theories from hypothesis' tested by research. Problem lies when the Hypothesis is tested with speculation rather than concrete, replicable, and verifiable results.
Darwins theory has never undergone anything more than a intellectual testing since you can't very well wait around thousands or millions of years to actually see and replicate what it says evolution can do.
Therefore a certain amount of his theory is based on faith and belief that is unprovable with our present means of research. Faith and belief are constantly criticized by science as baloney. Yet many of their important theories require some manner of bridging the gap between actual research and the original hypothesis...
Any one else want to offer an opinion?
|
Sure, I'll jump in. I'm sure you've heard of superbugs, right? Where do you think they come from? While we can't wait around for thousands of years, we can do experimentation with species that reproduce thousands of times per week or year. And while I don't follow the latest in biology, I've not heard any of these scientists complaining that Darwin was wrong, and they would as it would be just about the biggest thing to happen in Biology, since Darwin. I have heard about the various dna sequencing of difference species and how it's helping identify the relationship between species. BTW did you know that T-Rex is most closely related to the Chicken?