View Single Post
Old 04-29-2009, 04:15 PM   #28
6doublefive321
Resident Droog
 
6doublefive321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern burbs, Atlanta
Moto: 625 SMC, '08 Tuono R
Posts: 471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apoc View Post
Poor management is the reason these companies are where they are. Not unions. Too many models, too small of market shares.

They arent paying anyone, anything near 75$/hr... wish you people could understand this. 75$/hour per employee, is them including pensioned members, benefits, etc, squarely on the backs of the employees.
The loaded cost to the employer is $75! 75 freakin dollars per hour! If the average employee makes $25 per hour, the loaded cost is 3x that, which is way, way, way, way, way, way, way above industry average. The reason that the loaded cost is 3x the hourly wage is because of the GODDAMN UAW! Even though an employee isn't making $75 per hour, it still costs the employer $75 per hour.

The cost to build a car (or anything for that matter) is divided up between labor, materials, and overhead. If labor costs are 2x what they should be, then where is the difference made up? Materials, since a fixed overhead is required to build an average car. So, Ford, GM, and Chrysler settle for substandard materials to offset their outrageous labor costs, and thus their cars are steaming POS's. Thank you, UAW!
__________________
I'm sick and tired of being bored.
6doublefive321 is offline   Reply With Quote