Thread: Progress
View Single Post
Old 09-26-2009, 02:05 AM   #13
101lifts2
WSB Champion
 
101lifts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kerry_129 View Post
Yup - unibody structure & crumple-zones FTW.
I think the 'old cars are tougher/safer' myth comes from minor fender-bender accidents where a steel bumper sustains little damage vs. molded w/ styrofoam absorbers.
Also, it doesn't matter how well a 'heavy' car holds up in a crash if the occupants are turned to goo inside due to lack of crumple-zones & high deceleration G's.



You think?

http://www.automotive.com/2009/12/hy...sts/index.html

http://www.automotive.com/2010/12/ch...sts/index.html

(Though it does look like the Sonata has more likelyhood of trauma to legs/pelvis).
The Accent? lol

The late 1970s and early 1980s are tanks. I think if you ran a new car against one of those, the older car would cream the new ones. There is no substitue for metal. But...if you run a 1970s car into a fixed wall, then you are correct. You will sustain internal injuries.

Also, side impact standards and airbags have helped greatly to keep occupants in the same location after a crash.
__________________
Train Hard

Ron Paul - 2012

Mark of Excellence
GM
101lifts2 is offline   Reply With Quote