Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa_Complex
I said it before: Equitable.
The woman's health and future are at risk in the beginning. The man's finances are at risk for the future. And to top it off, as I also already stated, society's finances at at issue if the woman is left alone to raise the children, and can't do it alone.
I didn't blow anything out of the water. I'm remaining quite consistent in my argument.
I'm at lunch and frequently waiting for callbacks, so I've got time  |
I don't see how anything about it is equitable.
In the man's case once an egg gets fertilized he has zero options, his fate is completely out of his hands. The woman from that point can 1) take Plan B/RU486 and terminate immediately at virtually no risk to the "mother" (since she isn't technically pregnant yet), 2) have a low risk outpatient abortion performed, 3) put the baby up for adoption, or 4) keep the baby. Giving one party multiple options with risks ranging from virtually none to very low while the other party has zero options sounds pretty inequitable to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip
My wife is at 14 weeks right now, if she had an abortion today, her life would of been minimally impacted.
|
Congrats
