Congresswoman shot in Arizona

[udman]

...and the message boards are already blaming Sarah Palin and Sharon Angle

A K (Gumboz) wrote:

We don't know anything about the gunman or his motives. But we do know that Rep Giffords was one of the Democratic House members "targeted" with a "gun sight" on Sarah Palin's map. She said, "You know what to do." And now she'll say she's shocked -- SHOCKED -- that anybody would do such a thing.

Saturday, January 08, 2011 2:13:32 PM

Robin McMullen (RobinMcM) wrote:

Is Congresswoman Giffords's death one of the "Second Amendment remedies" that Sharron Angle advocated?

Saturday, January 08, 2011 2:13:18 PM

[goof2]

Originally Posted by udman

...and the message boards are already blaming Sarah Palin and Sharon Angle

I would have been surprised if they didn't, though that kind of speculation has been less than reliable in the past.

[udman]

Apparently Glenn Beck too...

im2fools 02:23 PM

Hey, Glenn Beck. Fuck you.

[Dave]

Originally Posted by udman

...and the message boards are already blaming Sarah Palin and Sharon Angle

it sickens me that this gal aint even cold yet before folks started trying to pull political value out of it. you should hear this douchbag david fitzsimmons comments on cnn.

[Avatard]

Originally Posted by Dave

it sickens me that this gal aint even cold yet before folks started trying to pull political value out of it. you should hear this douchbag david fitzsimmons comments on cnn.

I haven't heard the story yet, and I haven't clicked on any links yet, BUT:

If another politico indeed called for this woman's death, I wouldn't characterize this as "people trying to put political value on it". It's already there.

If Palin did call for this woman's death, even if essentially only by suggestive graphic and the veiled suggestion of "you know what to do", then she should be clearly charged for complicity in any murders committed as a result of what could only be characterized as a rather blatant public incitement and inducement of murder.

I believe in free speech, but you can't yell fire in a theatre. Speech designed to cause death and harm to others is not protected. That's actually technically conspiracy/complicity to murder.

If this woman dies, Palin should be charged, if she indeed made these overt murder suggestions in a public forum.

I think it's fair to say that given her rather high public profile, she should be well aware that this type of incitement would likely lead to violence.

[udman]

Originally Posted by Avatard

I haven't heard the story yet, and I haven't clicked on any links yet, BUT:

If another politico indeed called for this woman's death, I wouldn't characterize this as "people trying to put political value on it". It's already there.

If Palin did call for this woman's death, even if essentially only by suggestive graphic and the veiled suggestion of "you know what to do", then she should be clearly charged for complicity in any murders committed as a result of what could only be characterized as a rather blatant public incitement and inducement of murder.

I believe in free speech, but you can't yell fire in a theatre. Speech designed to cause death and harm to others is not protected. That's actually technically conspiracy/complicity to murder.

If this woman dies, Palin should be charged, if she indeed made these overt murder suggestions in a public forum.

She wanted her voted out of office. Not Killed. But go ahead with the casting blame dumbass...

[Dave]

Originally Posted by Avatard

I haven't heard the story yet, and I haven't clicked on any links yet, BUT:

If another politico indeed called for this woman's death, I wouldn't characterize this as "people trying to put political value on it". It's already there.

If Palin did call for this woman's death, even if essentially only by suggestive graphic and the veiled suggestion of "you know what to do", then she should be clearly charged for complicity in any murders committed as a result of what could only be characterized as a rather blatant public incitement and inducement of murder.

I believe in free speech, but you can't yell fire in a theatre. Speech designed to cause death and harm to others is not protected. That's actually technically conspiracy/complicity to murder.

If this woman dies, Palin should be charged, if she indeed made these overt murder suggestions in a public forum.

I think it's fair to say that given her rather high public profile, she should be well aware that this type of incitement would likely lead to violence.

i was referring to the idiot political cartoonist they were interviewing on cnn who immediately blamed the right, america's "gun fetish", and said this was an inevitable event. try not to let your personal prejudices lead you into dumb statements

[Avatard]

Originally Posted by Dave

i was referring to the idiot political cartoonist they were interviewing on cnn who immediately blamed the right, america's "gun fetish", and said this was an inevitable event. try not to let your personal prejudices lead you into dumb statements

Again, I have no knowledge of this other than what appears here.

I do know that if what was said here about what was supposedly posted on Palin's site is true, then that's incitement to murder, and not protected speech.