![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
![]()
Dropping a tooth in front sucks, because I've found that it increases noise & chain wear. I don't see why people don't go +3 or +4 in the rear, instead of doing the same old -1/+2
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
|
![]()
I believe most bikes require a longer chain once the rear sprocket gets too big. They can use the same chain and still be around the middle of their adjustment range using the -1/+2 method.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
WSB Champion
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Train Hard Ron Paul - 2012 Mark of Excellence GM |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
![]()
True, but chains are cheap, and it's a perfect opportunity to go 520 too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|