Report says return to moon isn’t ‘viable’ - Page 2

goof2 · 09-09-2009, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karl_1052

Fixed it for ya.

I hope you are kidding.

101lifts2 · 09-09-2009, 10:26 PM

We need to actually land on the moon first...

Apoc · 09-09-2009, 11:03 PM

You did land on the moon, and they planted reflectors there that can be found at exact co-ordinates with good enough telescopes. They are man made reflectors, placed there by the landing crew.

goof2 · 09-10-2009, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apoc

You did land on the moon, and they planted reflectors there that can be found at exact co-ordinates with good enough telescopes. They are man made reflectors, placed there by the landing crew.

And the Russians, at the time called the USSR and kind of America's sworn enemy, had the capability to track spacecraft sent there. They also had every interest in showing America to be liars in front of the world. They decided not to do so. I guess they were feeling magnanimous that day.

Kaneman · 09-10-2009, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2

And the Russians, at the time called the USSR and kind of America's sworn enemy, had the capability to track spacecraft sent there. They also had every interest in showing America to be liars in front of the world. They decided not to do so. I guess they were feeling magnanimous that day.

Or they were even easier to fool than the American public. =)

Tmall · 09-10-2009, 10:04 AM

Is that the emperors new clothes theory?

Apoc · 09-10-2009, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tmall

Is that the emperors new clothes theory?

He hasn't got any clothes on!

I really didnt like that book.

Homeslice · 09-10-2009, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goof2

And the Russians, at the time called the USSR and kind of America's sworn enemy, had the capability to track spacecraft sent there. They also had every interest in showing America to be liars in front of the world. They decided not to do so. I guess they were feeling magnanimous that day.

Or maybe they just went along with it in order to justify massive space & defense spending

karl_1052 · 09-10-2009, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apoc

He hasn't got any clothes on!

I really didnt like that book.

I figured it would be your favorite, with the naked 10 year old boy and all.

Apoc · 09-10-2009, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karl_1052

I figured it would be your favorite, with the naked 10 year old boy and all.

You know damn well I didnt mind that part....

09-09-2009, 10:26 PM	#12
101lifts2 WSB Champion Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Anaheim, CA Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R Posts: 5,570	We need to actually land on the moon first... __________________ Train Hard Ron Paul - 2012 Mark of Excellence GM Last edited by 101lifts2; 09-09-2009 at 10:31 PM..

09-09-2009, 11:03 PM	#13
Apoc For Science. You Monster. Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Canada Moto: '08 HD FLSTSB Posts: 3,546	You did land on the moon, and they planted reflectors there that can be found at exact co-ordinates with good enough telescopes. They are man made reflectors, placed there by the landing crew.

09-10-2009, 10:04 AM	#16
Tmall Aspiring Rapper Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Halifax, NS Moto: '12 CB1000R Posts: 3,569	Is that the emperors new clothes theory?