|
01-07-2011, 08:11 AM | #1 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Yep.
So now they are telling me the Vacancy policy covers liability and damage, but not the contents. Well if it doesn't cover contents like his old policy did, why is it more expensive? Yeah I know there's more risk if it's vacant, but IMO the biggest risk would be someone stealing the contents, yet they're not even going to cover the contents, so why is it so expensive? Dipshits. I'm going to ask about a builders risk policy. |
01-07-2011, 08:27 AM | #2 | |
SFL Expatriate #1
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ATL Burbs
Moto: '09 Triumph Speed Triple
Posts: 4,712
|
Quote:
|
|
01-07-2011, 08:54 PM | #3 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Not to mention arson,vandalism, etc... Neighborhood teenagers will jack a vacant house up in a minute.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|